Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniela Vismane vs Jacqueline Cabaj Awad Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vismane vs Awad analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Daniela Vismane vs Jacqueline Cabaj Awad Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vismane 1 - 0 Awad
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vismane has won 43.41% of points on their second serve, while Awad has won 37.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vismane, in recent form, has won 55.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Awad has won 58.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.25% and 42.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vismane has saved 52.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Awad has saved 51.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vismane has won 50.77% of matches played (W/L 33/ 32), with Awad winning 53.03% (W/L 35/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vismane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 27/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Awad has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 54/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 66/ 82).
- Player level: In the last year, Vismane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.43% of matches (W/L 26/ 30), where as Awad has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.02% of matches (W/L 25/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vismane winning 1 times and Awad being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vismane winning 2 and Awad winning 0. The last match between Vismane and Awad was at the W25 Cairo, 11-03-2020, First, Hard with Daniela Vismane getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vismane and Awad have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vismane winning 0 times and Awad 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vismane winning 0, and Awad 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vismane has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.4 while Awad has played against players with an average rank of 307.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vismane has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Awad has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vismane has converted 46.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Awad has converted 49.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
394
Rank
228
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
431
Rank
387
High
28
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
61% (233-150)
Career Total W/L
56% (324-250)
48% (16-17)
YTD W/L
58% (23-17)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniela Vismane vs Jacqueline Cabaj Awad For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Vismane VS Awad
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Daniela Vismane | Jacqueline Cabaj Awad |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (35/50) | 66% (47/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (21/35) | 43% (20/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (6/15) | 38% (9/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (42/71) | 46% (23/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniela Vismane
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniela Vismane | Jacqueline Cabaj Awad |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (16/17) | 58% (23/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (33/41) | 59% (53/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (326/353) | 53% (430/382) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (22/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (16/17) | 0% (0/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 54 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.51 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 204 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:45 | 1:36:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 235.12 | 307.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1530/2175) | 65% (1675/2571) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (830/1530) | 63% (1063/1675) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (280/645) | 38% (337/896) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (147/313) | 49% (176/357) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1086/2267) | 49% (1251/2577) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (9/15) | 52% (13/12) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 77% (10/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (14/31) | 57% (23/40) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 84% (25/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 16% (25/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (18/2) | 13% (15/2) |
Daniela Vismane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Daniela Vismane
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Qianhui Tang
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Yana Morderger
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Daniela Vismane
37%
(
39 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
55%
(
36 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Daniela Vismane
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Daniela Vismane
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Daniela Vismane
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Sophia Ksandinov
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Daniela Vismane
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hannah Klugman
Player
Daniela Vismane
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
-
Aces
-
14
Double Faults
0
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
73
|
6-0 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Jessica Marmorstein
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
42%
(
15 of
36)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
86%
(
88 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
13
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
51%
(
52 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Haine Ogata
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Christine Gouws
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Katherine Sebov
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
74%
(
107 of
145)
2
Aces
0
16
Double Faults
7
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
52 of
107)
24%
(
10 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
Break Points Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
53%
(
61 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
77 of
145)
132
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Matilde Jorge
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Olga Helmi
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Vismane Vs Awad Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Vismane are available here and Awad photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
